This is going to sound morbid and horrible. I knew it before I even opened this page. But sometimes you have to admit there’s someone inside you no one likes to recognize. Someone who wonders about those gruesome details, someone who wants to know more.
I think serial killers–any killers–are the ones who recognize that other person inside themselves and realize it is just themselves. Everyone has a dark side. Not many people like to admit it.
I’m admitting it. I’m curious, and this happens to be the perfect place to write down all my curiosities.
Don’t read on if you might be inclined to believe I’m a sociopath. I’m not. Not in any way. All of this is just pure curiosity, just ramblings from that shadowy darker side. Do not take them as facts, do not take them as fantasies. They are neither.
And most of all, do not try this at home.
What is this big question I have? What am I being so secretive and warningful about?
I’m wondering what it would take to create the perfect serial killer.
This would be different. Not one from the books. Not one who tortured little animals, not one who works out of passion. Would anyone even recognize the work of a serial killer if they did not have their previous profiles? What if the very essence of the differences in a serial killer is their profile?
Let me explain.
I watch a lot of TV. Too much, some people might say. I watch all the crime shows, and the biggest one is Criminal Minds. It struck me as odd how all of their killers are alike in most ways, so I thought, “What if they weren’t?” and that got me to wondering what would change, what would stay the same, and how they would catch a serial killer that had no motive, no reason beyond their own wonderings. What if there was one now and we didn’t know it?
If this is too morbid, now is the time to stop reading. Because next is a list, and if you’re starting to think I’m insane, the list will only serve to cement your belief. I’m not insane. (I’m sure all the insane people say that.)
The Perfect Serial Killer.
1. Would be a woman. When people think “serial killer,” they think men.
2. Would be either very young, 18-20, or very old, 60-75. Again, this detracts from the “male late thirties” anthem people wave like a flag.
3. Would be ethnically different, anything noticeably other than caucasion. African American, Asian, Indian. No one thinks of black people in the same terms as they think of serial killers. Cover. Who would guess it?
4. Would have no obvious motive for their crimes. They wouldn’t kill out of passion, rage, the usual suspects. This would be no revenge spree. They would kill coldly, but not too coldly. They would not be overly cruel, but not kind in any way. There would be no sympathy, just curiosity perhaps (this will likely lose a lot of people, considering my earlier speech about curiosity)
5. When police look for a killer, they look at motive. Abusive father. Dead mother. Foster home. Thus this killer would come from an ordinary life. Not too ordinary. Raised in a middle-class household, maybe two or three close friends growing up, a boyfriend in high school, dating every few weeks. For the older ladies: still married to their high school sweetheart, maybe on their second marriage, worked since they were young, retired late. Content household, not too rich not too poor, perhaps on the comfy side. No reason for breaking from the pattern. No evidence.
6. Methodical. This is where the two paths–my fictious one and the prolific one–cross. The woman would be methodical down to the details. She could have OCD, but passively, not aggressive in-your-face nonsense. She would take everything in stride, keep a cool head. This would perhaps put her in a position of some power–not much, but some. A low-management employment. Admired, and warm to her comrades but really feels nothing for them. Has no compassion.
7. Thorough. Gives everything five checks, every detail accounted for, every variable factored in like a mathematician with his numbers. There would be room for wriggling if needed, an exit strategy, several escape routes and cover plans. Nothing would differ from the original plan except in the worst-case scenario when there is something wrong. Then there would be a second-best plan to cover her tracks.
8. Nothing would be the same. The methods of killing would be different, every one of them. Once most of the popular ones were used up, she would copy one of the old ones but in a new way. There would alwways be new ways. If the police were trying to figure her out, she would perhaps pick victims of the same type twice in a row, not a different one each time because that difference would allow for a profile to be drawn.
9. She would maintain contact with the outside world. In all appearance, a dedicated worker but not too dedicated, and people believe she just wants to go home for some Ben & Jerry’s after a long day’s work. Likes vacations, but does not vacation at every time of each murder. They’re always varied, some during some not. Some during overtime hours some when there is no work at all.
10. She would have quirks. She’d be memorable, but the kind of memorable that fades when she’s out of sight. A normal person bites their fingernails or plays with their hair. Different signs for different emotions. She would too. Nothing too unusual but nothing too common. Every action examined down to its base, reaction and memorability.
That’s all i can think of right now. Truthfully, now that I go back and look at it, it seems horrible. That’s my sunny side showing. Really, I would want no part in anything like this. I’m just curious. Curious and compassionate and caucasion and nowhere near the age or status quo, thank you very much.
Once again, do not try this at home.